Dunn and Lockhart

Cars turn left off of Lockhart onto Dunn Road, north of Denham Springs. The intersection will soon sport a roundabout, but in the mean time a developer wants to put roughly 70 homes on 22 acres of land on the corner. The developer proposes to push the entrance and exit onto Lockhart.

How far should government intervention go?

It’s an age-old question that crops up just about every five minutes on social media, every ten minutes on television, and every day in government offices.

The answer is… complicated.

Why? For starters, folks continue to ask for more governmental control over certain things, and not realizing until it’s too late that those controls might affect them – maybe not now, but later.

Or perhaps right now.

Take subdivision restrictions, for instance. There was a meeting last Tuesday, Nov. 26 at Fire Protection District 5 in Denham Springs. Residents were concerned about a new subdivision that appeared Wednesday before the parish’s planning commission. The developer proposed nearly 70 homes for 22 acres, on 1/3 acre lots.

Drainage and traffic were discussed at the meeting, both of which require impact studies before the subdivision is clear for build. Attendees at the meeting were informed of the restrictions the parish council currently has on challenging residential development, but that zoning would help.

A notion that has become a very regular mention at the parish council meetings.

But when the idea that those restrictions could come back and affect those pushing for it, two camps emerge – those who ‘don’t care’ and those who suddenly back off the idea.

It doesn’t matter, however, because the ball is already moving toward more government control, at least over development and infrastructure, and there’s not much to do about stopping the movement.

Why? Because the more we understand about the way infrastructure works and how individual people affect it, the more we understand that we are all connected.

While this is more true in crowded areas which are now suburban, it still rings out in the rural areas as well. Take, for instance, Berry Ridge in the Springfield area – a new development that could possibly displace a lot of water and put dozens of new vehicles on one of Livingston Parish’s patented ’18-foot roads.’

Something more specific? How about two landowners in District 1, represented by Jeff Ard, who both sit on multi-acre lots. One landowner decides to put in a crushed gravel driveway over the ditch, with a culvert sized too small to move water during the large rainfalls that are now commonplace over the summer.

The result? Water backs up into the neighbor’s yard – even though they’re 100 yards away – and in some cases, gets near the house. That crushed gravel driveway and culvert has now affected the health, safety, and welfare of their neighbor.

Combine that with tighter restrictions on grant applications through both the state and federal government, as well as tighter restrictions on state and federal infrastructure projects with direct investment, and the parish of Livingston has cooked the perfect recipe for tighter restrictions.

It’s time to accept that Livingston Parish is in this together, and that includes roads, drainage, sewer, water, gas, even public works cleaning ditches – and if citizens are looking for better and more efficient provision of infrastructure, they’re going to have to accept tighter restrictions.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.